|
| |
nextnano3 - Tutorial
next generation 3D nano device simulator
1D Tutorial
pn-junction
Note: This tutorial's copyright is owned by Stefan Birner,
www.nextnano.de.
Author:
Stefan Birner
Please send comments to nextnano3 (-at-) wsi.tum.de.
If you want to obtain the input files that are used within this tutorial, please contact stefan.birner@nextnano.de.
-> 1DGaAs_pn_junction.in
-> 1DGaAs_pn_junction_QM.in
-> 2DGaAs_pn_junction.in
-> 3DGaAs_pn_junction.in
Note: nextnano++ input files are available
for this tutorial. Please contact support [at] nextnano.de for
prices.
pn-junction
-> 1DGaAs_pn_junction.in
This tutorial aims to reproduce figure 3.1 (p. 51) of
Joachim Piprek's
book "Semiconductor
Optoelectronic Devices - Introduction to Physics and Simulation" (Section 3.2 "pn-Junctions").
Doping concentration
- The structure consists of 300 nm GaAs.
At the left and right boundaries, metal contacts are connected to the GaAs
semiconductor (i.e. from 0 nm to 10 nm, and from 310 nm to 320 nm).
The structure is p-type doped from 10 nm to 160 nm and n-type doped from 160
nm to 310 nm.
- The following figure shows the concentration of donors and acceptors of
the pn-junction.
In the p-type region between 10 nm and 160 nm, the number of acceptors NA
is 0.5 x 1018 cm-3.
In the n-type region between 160 nm and 310 nm, the number of donors ND
is 2.0 x 1018 cm-3.

Carrier concentrations
- The equilibrium condition for a pn-junction is achieved by a small
transfer of electrons from the n region to the p region, where they recombine
with holes. This leads to a depletion region (depletion width = wp
+ wn), i.e. the region around the pn-junction only has very few
free carriers left.
- The following figure shows the electron and hole densities and the
depletion region around the pn-junction at 160 nm. Here, we assumed that all
donors and acceptors are fully ionized.

Net charges (space charge)
- In the depletion region, a net charge results from the ionized donors ND
and ionized acceptors NA.
- The following figure shows the net charge density of the pn-junction.

Electric field
- The slope of the electric field is proportional to the net charge (Poisson
equation), thus the extremum of the electric field is expected to be at the
pn-junction.
- In regions without charges, the electric field is zero.
- The following figure shows the electric field of the pn-junction.

The extremum of the electric field Fmax (at 160 nm) can be
approximated as follows:
Fmax = - e NA wp / (epsilon epsilon0)
= - 6.997 x 1014 V/m2 wp = 387 kV/cm
= - e ND wn /
(epsilon epsilon0) = - 2.799 x 1015 V/m2 wn
= 386 kV/cm
where
e = 1.6022 x 10-19 As
epsilon = 12.93 (dielectric constant of GaAs)
epsilon0 = 8.854 x 10-12 As/(Vm)
NA = 0.5 x 1018 cm-3
ND = 2.0 x 1018 cm-3
wp = 55.3 nm
wn = 13.8 nm
Electrostatic potential, conduction and valence band edges
- In regions, where the electric field is zero, the electrostatic potential
is constant.
- The electrostatic potential phi determines the conduction and valence band
edges:
Ec = Ec0 - e phi
Ev = Ev0 - e phi
- The following figure shows the conduction and valence band edges, the
electrostatic potential and the Fermi level of the pn-junction.

Without external bias (i.e. equilibrium), the Fermi level EF is
constant (EF = 0 eV).
The built-in potential phibi was calculated by nextnano³ to
be equal to 1.426 V.
It can be approximated as follows:
phibi = Fmax (wp + wn)
/ 2
Assuming Fmax = 387 kV/cm, this would indicate for the depletion
width: wp + wn = 73.7 nm.
To allow for a constant chemical potential (i.e. constant Fermi level EF),
a total potential difference of -e phibi is required.
Quantum mechanical calculation
-> 1DGaAs_pn_junction_QM.in
- Here, instead of calculating the densities classically, we solve the
Schroedinger equation for the electrons, light and heavy holes in the
single-band approximation over the whole device. We calculate up to 300
eigenvalues for each band. Thus the electron and hole densities are calculated
purely quantum mechanically.
- The following figure shows the electron and hole concentrations for the
classical and quantum mechanical calculations. For the QM calculations,
different boundary conditions were used.
- Dirichlet boundary conditions force the wavefunctions to be zero at
the boundaries, thus the density goes to zero at the boundaries which is
unphysically.
- Neumann boundary conditions lead to unphysically large values at
the boundaries.
- Mixed boundary conditions are in between.
For the classical calculation, the densities at the boundaries are constant.
Nevertheless, in the interesting region around the pn-junction, all four
options lead to identical densities.

- The following figure shows the band edges of the pn-junction for the four
cases:
- classical calculation
- quantum mechanical calculation with Dirichlet boundary conditions
- quantum mechanical calculation with Neumann boundary conditions
- quantum mechanical calculation with mixed boundary conditions
For all cases the band edges are identical in the area around the pn-junction.
Tiny deviations exist at the boundaries of the device.

- This figure is a zoom into the right boundary of the conduction band edge.
On this scale, the tiny deviations for the different boundary conditions can
be clearly seen.

Non-equilibrium
- So-called "quasi-Fermi levels" which are different for electrons (EF,n)
and holes (EF,p) are used to describe non-equilibrium carrier
concentrations.
In equilibrium the quasi-Fermi levels are constant and have the same value for
both electrons and holes (EF,n = EF,p = 0 eV).
The current is proportional to the mobility and the gradient of the
quasi-Fermi level EF.
2D/3D simulations
-> 2DGaAs_pn_junction.in
-> 3DGaAs_pn_junction.in
Input files for the same pn junction structure as in 1D, but this time for a
2D and 3D simulation are also available.
==> 2D: rectangle of dimension 320 nm x 200 nm
==> 3D: cuboid of dimension 320 nm x 200 nm x
100 nm
- Please help us to improve our tutorial! Send comments to
nextnano3
(-at-) wsi.tum.de.
|